![clamxav vs malwarebytes clamxav vs malwarebytes](https://alternative.me/media/1280/malwarebytes-anti-exploit-screenshot-e1r0u4c3t5724nhk.png)
As for AV software: I would never install that. Almost all antivirus solutions for Linux are for central protection of Windows users that happen to use the Linux server.
#Clamxav vs malwarebytes for free#
Other than that, I am careful which sites I visit especially those that offer software/apps for free which costs money elsewhere - they sometimes include unwanted additions. Most of the Mac antivirus utilities Ive evaluated offer two kinds of scans, a quick scan that looks for active malware and checks the most likely areas for infestation, and a full scan that covers your entire computer. If necessary, I would install and run Malwarebytes to get rid of an annoying popup, etc. ClamXAV and Malwarebytes dont promise to detect Windows malware even so, ClamXAV detected 43 percent of my samples. Among them, ClamXAV, Bitdefender, Intego, Norton, Malwarebytes, and Avast. I've used Macs for over 25 years and I have never installed or run any aV software. There is a significant list of antimalware solutions available for macOS. Mac OS Catalina has excellent protection built in in fact, the system/OS is now contained in a read-only volume which means no one can gain access to do any harm. Malwarebytes was developed by a long time contributor here it is mostly to get rid of malware and adware. ClamXAV is light on processing but heavy on malware. Set it to scan automatically or run instant checks on suspicious files. Scan a specific file or your entire hard drive. Most long time contributors here suggest no AV software as it will slow down your Mac and some can cause problems and corruption. ClamXAV keeps threats at bay and puts you firmly in charge of your Mac’s security. FWIW, we are not Apple employees, just other end users. Well, asking in an online forum will always result in many different opinions.